Another good blog

So, I'd looked at The Passive Voice blog before and not gotten it--the fellow's a lawyer, so you wind up with articles on some pretty random things (like right now the top story is on voice-recognition software). He also posts a lot of news stories and things from other blogs, and I was like, what's the point of another aggregate blog?

But I've read through more of it now, and I do recommend it. It's a good aggregate blog, for one thing, and for another, his remarks on the material he posts are often interesting and insightful. For example, he notes that authors are paying $308 million to traditional publishers to have them format and upload e-books, and he offers to do that for half the price. If they take him up on it, he doesn't just promise them a really big box of candy with a bright red bow--in the comments he promises a pony!

Progress report

I marked up edits to four chapters, so I'm now up to Chapter 19. I'm doing child care tomorrow, so I'll input them the day after that.

It's going to be an exciting round of edits because there's actually some poetry in these chapters, and I am really, really not a poet. It's just doggerel--the kind of poetry that exists so that you remember things better, like "Three in the head, you know they're dead." When I was younger, I used to be able to kick out that sort of thing fairly easily (at length, even), but apparently it's one of those things you lose as you age. Or as you stop reading poetry, because you are no longer in college fulfilling the requirements to graduate as an English major. One or the other....

Progress report

Yay, progress!

I input the changes to the five chapters, including tightening the section I thought needed tightening, so that's good. I'm up to chapter 15 out of, um, 26 and an epilogue, so 27 chapters.

In non-progress (i.e. things I spend my time doing instead of editing, because they have firmer deadlines) I read that draft novel. That went fine (and I think it helped get me back into Trust, because I basically transitioned from editing that book to editing my own), but I've read part of it before, and I feel like I'm becoming less and less useful as an editor for this thing. I mean, do things seem cleaner and easier to understand because the revisions were good, or because I'm not reading this for the first time? It's an issue, and of course it begs the question of how well a person can ever edit their own writing, considering that they know it like the back of their hand.

Pleasingly, after my sister suggested I start Trials, I've been thinking a lot about how I want to write it--which is something I've been doing for a while. I realized that this is because I'm excited about it. That's a good sign, because sometimes when you stall out you start wondering if that means you've just had it as a writer (or just had it as a writer of this series as surely as P.G. Wodehouse had it with Jeeves and Wooster). I think I just have gotten burnt out on Trust, but if I push through these next twelve chapters, I can hand it off to people to read, and then I won't have to look at it again for a while. Instead, I'll get nice and burnt out on Trials, and hopefully by the time I can't even bear to look at that manuscript any more, I'll be all set to incorporate the feedback on Trust!

You know something? I've decided that figuring out how to be a full-time novel writer is the project for my 40s. Breaking into publishing was the project for my 20s, becoming a journalist was the project for my 30s (well, late 20s-through-mid 30s), and working out how to write novels full time is my project now.

And what am I doing?

I have something of a sinus infection--one of those low-level ones that just kind of makes you tired. I could do fine with the covers, and I'm able to read Proust, so I'm not completely wiped out but neither am I at 100%.

I'm supposed to read over a draft novel by someone from writers' group--what I've read of it so far is really good, so I'm excited and will start that after I watch kidlets tomorrow. I'm also glad to have the whole novel to read in one go--I feel like one necessary limitation of any writers' group is that there's no practical way to have people read an entire book. So you're stuck with a fragment, which may or may not be the first chapter. That can be OK: I started this thing on, I think, chapter 17, and I could tell that it was very good; likewise it only took one chapter for me to see that other books had big problems. But I think in terms of giving more-detailed feedback to the writer, as well as catching things like repetitions or characters who appear without having been introduced, it's really helpful to have the whole thing.

And my sister suggested that if I get stuck editing Trust, then maybe I should start writing Trials. I'm not sure if this is good advice or not--it may be a bit like the French distracting themselves from that horrible war in Algeria by turning their attention to Vietnam. On the other hand, if the problem is that I am simply too familiar with the material at this point (and that certainly happens--I like to let things lie fallow for a while so that I can look at them with fresh eyes), this could be very helpful. And perhaps writing Trials will be such a, um, trial that I will happily return to Trust!

B & N, but not D or C!

This from the Wall Street Journal (and originally reported by Bleeding Cool): Barnes & Noble is pulling DC Entertainment titles (including things like Watchmen, V for Vendetta, and Y: The Last Man, so we're not talking obscure properties here) from its store shelves because DC entered into an exclusive arrangement to sell e-books through Amazon's Kindle Fire, which leaves B&N's Nook out in the cold.

So, basically DC did the math and decided that it was more important to them to be available on Kindle Fire than to be available at your local Barnes & Noble store.

That's interesting. One of Joe Konrath's predictions has been that, as more authors decide they can do fine self-publishing, the dearth of material to sell will cause problems for traditional publishing houses. This is a little different, but it's a publisher deciding that they'll do fine withholding material from the largest chain of traditional bookstores in the United States.

The old system is clearly breaking down here....

Progress report (covers covers covers edition)

      

OK, so here they are! It all seemed squared away, except when I updated the covers at Amazon and B&N, the cover text looked all blocky and wonkus--I'm going to have to check back when the covers actually go up and see if I won't have to (sigh) create very special display covers for them, since their display resolution apparently sucks eggs. 

On a more random note, I started checking Web stats on this site, and I think I'm going to have to stop, because it's quickly become A Thing To Do Every Day (which puts it well on the road to being A Major Distraction). The perils of writing in the Internet Age! 

I did the Trust cover, mostly!

Yeah! I think that's going to be it, plus a little tweaking. The palm sure looks fat in a thumbnail....

I was going to do this yesterday, but then the power went out all afternoon. I had just been questioning the wisdom of having a stockpile of canned food for winter, and the outage made me realize that I am no longer in NYC and at the first hint of inclement weather (if that--the weather yesterday was fine), all services come to a screeching halt here. So I did yard work and ran errands instead.

Anyway, back to the cover--the title font is one that I had been leaning toward with Trang, because it is so very 1960s, and this series is '60s-style social sci-fi. (Note the portal! A visual motif for the series!) I had thought that creating the Trust cover would help me decide on a font, and I think it does. It's evocative of (that's the phrase my sister says I'm looking for--not "ripped off from") Star Trek, which I think is about right.

A shocking decision!

Well, maybe not exactly shocking, but...I was working on the back jacket of Trang, and I decided to remove my author photo.

I have been told on multiple occasions that you simply must have an author photo--a really, really good-looking author photo. Of course I have an EXTREMELY professional-looking author photo on this very Web site, which has had many benefits, including allowing for me to reconnect with a pen pal I started writing to when I was in junior high. (Hi Stella!) But that's not the kind of photo they mean.

I know someone who clearly received the same advice and took it. She is a very, very serious journalist who published a very, very serious book on war. And her author photo looks like she's trying to be cast in a remake of Charlie's Angels. Don't get me wrong--it's a great-looking photo, and she is a beautiful woman, but honestly, would a man be expected to tart it up to sell a book on war? When said serious book on war was seriously and favorably reviewed in the serious New York Times, would the review have featured a HUGE reproduction of that author photo? Because, yah, yah, war is bad and it's really important to understand troubled countries, but hey--did you see how hott that author chick is? Rrrrawrrr!

So, I'm taking off the photo--I'm just not comfortable with the concept, I guess, and I've had enough problems with stalkers. Instead, I'm putting in that quote from New Podler instead. It's sexaaaay!

What else did I do today? I spiffed up the e-book descriptions a bit, since Christmas is coming and typically (or, as typically as people know--this is maybe a three-year-old market) there's a post-holiday bump in sales as everyone who got a Kindle or Nook for Christmas starts looking for titles to put on it. The problem is basically that someone, somewhere decided that multiple-paragraph book descriptions were bad, so all the "about the author" and "from the book jacket" stuff got run up together with the description and the whole thing is basically unreadable. It's especially annoying because when you're typing in the book description, the paragraph breaks work fine--it's only in the actual finished product that it's screwed up.

Finding a proofreader

Despite the visiting relative (who went home yesterday), I actually have been making progress. That's the benefit of realizing I have many small things to do along with the really big things--when I found myself with some random spare time, I was able to get things done.

Specifically, I was able to hook up with a proofreader! A friend who I used to work with in publishing recommended him--he mostly works for a mainstream book publisher, which I think is a good sign, because in my experience they take proofreading quite seriously. So I mailed the Trang layout to him.

I felt that his proposed fee was quite reasonable, but when I mentioned it to someone I know from writers' group, they were astounded at how cheap it was. Maybe I'm being naive, but it seems to me that this proofreader has set up his business the same way I did when I was a freelance writer--if you're fast (which I was back in the day--fast and efficient, if you can believe it), you can charge a high-enough hourly rate to make a good living, but since any given job doesn't take that many hours, you're still not expensive to your clients. That way you offer a good value, and you build a solid client base because people will come back to you and recommend you to others. This is one of the reasons I'm so skeptical of people offering really expensive services to writers--I don't look at the price tag and think, "Gee, you must be really good!" I think, "Gee, you must have to make money fast before the suckers wise up!"

Trang is up on Indie Spotlight!

So, Trang's here on Indie Spotlight--note the placeholder cover art. I sent it in to them back in March, which gives you an idea of the waiting time on these things. All sorts of things have changed since then--the pricing, the blog address--but at least it's got the revised description. (Although, why is "diplomat" italicized?)

I guess we'll see if it drives any interest. When Trang was listed on Spalding's Racket, there was basically zero response, so now I'm skeptical of the marketing value of sites that just list title after title without providing actual reviews. On the other hand, I got to write a bit about the process of writing the book, so maybe that will spark interest. Who knows?

Progress report; or, why it's good to have a writing blog

Yes! It's a miracle, but I have progress to report!

I'd say this is a great example of why it's useful to have something like a blog, where you have to trot out in public and say, "Sorry, I didn't get anything done." You do that enough, and eventually you get shamed into doing something.

I've still got the basic problem that my time is all chopped up, which makes it hard to focus on something big, like editing Trust. But after writing yesterday's (humiliating) post, I realized that I do have a lot of smaller production-related projects that need to be done. Not only that, but it's probably better to do these things now, rather than wait until I've laid out and formatted Trust, and am completely burnt out on production.

So, today I tweaked the hard-copy layout of Trang and started poking around for a proofreader. I also noodled with Trang's cover--I like the art, but I think the font is just sort of there. It's legible, which is important (a lot of fonts make the word TRANG look like IRANC, so it looks like I've written a very, very poorly-researched book about Iran and Iraq), but it doesn't really suggest anything about the kind of book Trang is. I also started the cover for Trust (when I decided on the Trang cover, I sketched out how I want all four covers to look)--I've narrowed down the cover fonts to a few finalists, and I'm going to try them on both covers before I make a final selection.

Bowing to reality

I realized last night that, hey, we're almost in October, there's no way I'm going to have Trust totally done by the end of 2011. So I bumped all the book dates forward a year--they were only guesstimates anyway. Maybe I'm being pessimistic, but we've got another houseguest coming this week (a relative who last visited in July and who we'll see again at Thanksgiving--there's been a lot of stressful change in my family lately, and this person is feeling a bit needy), so that blows this editing round straight to hell, again. Plus, after I finish this (eternal!) edit, I want to give it to some beta readers, and of course they all have jobs and lives, so they're not going to react to well to some insane deadline. And THEN I will have to do more editing, proofing, layout, formatting, cover....yeah, it's going to be 2012.

But I think what I'll do when I finish this edit (which hopefully will happen BEFORE I DIE) is to start the next book. Also, while I'm waiting on the beta reads, I can do the cover of Trust, which should be less of a conceptual marathon than Trang was. I actually want to add a little polish to Trang as well by revising some things on the cover and poking around to see if I can't find a proofreader.

Oh, and this is making the rounds, and is funny: https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-snc7/s720x720/309470_217207405007555_100001548917930_604086_764865006_n.jpg I would only add that, even when you're being successful, you never really feel like you're out of the scramble!

My experience so far with BookRooster

As I've mentioned, I'm kind of blowing off marketing (well, I guess right now I'm kind of blowing off everything, but at least I'm starting to feel better), but a couple of months ago I did pony up $49 to give BookRooster a shot. What they do is to distribute review copies to their subscriber base. I used to be a reporter, and I am very sensitive about how unethical it is to pay for reviews (a sensitivity that is clearly not shared by many, many, many Internet review sites). But BookRooster passed the smell test--all they are giving people is a review copy of your book, which of course is exactly what you give any reviewer. 

Of course, the downside of not participating in an unethical fee-for-service arrangement is that you cannot be guaranteed the service. BookRooster will offer your book to its subscribers for free until you get 10 reviews, but they don't hold a gun to their subscribers' heads and force them to review it.

My book went on offer there a month ago, and so far I've gotten...one review. Now, that review is a wonder--five stars, and the person wrote me a lovely e-mail (they even found a broken link on my Web site). I really, really appreciate that reviewer. A lot.

But one review is not ten. This paucity of reviews was not a shock to me: I found out about BookRooster through Joe Konrath's blog. He used it to promote Flee, and when I looked at the reviews I noticed that an awful lot of them began something like, "I love Konrath's books and couldn't wait to read this one!" If you've got an established fan base (or, I would assume, if you're writing in a really popular genre), you're going to get a lot of reviews very quickly. If you don't, then BookRooster isn't going to be a panacea.

Still, I figured the service would be worth it to me even if I didn't get a ton of reviews. For so long I've had all of one review on Amazon. (NO, I have not begged my friends and family to review my book--have I mentioned that I really don't like marketing?) Although that review was useful in that it did make me rethink my positioning of the book, it was really annoying to have the most-visible review of Trang be one written by someone who was not ever going to like or understand the book, especially knowing that there were better reviewers out there.

Book too hard

I was feeling much better this morning, a-leaping out of bed with great ambitions to do things, maybe even to edit Trust! That lasted until I had to do difficult things like stand upright and eat breakfast. But even then I, ever the optimist, was thinking I might be able to engage in a demanding mental task (like editing Trust!). To test this, I picked up Marcel Proust. Five pages later, I acknowledged defeat.

Yes, I am reading Proust--I'm up to the third volume of Remembrance of Things Past (now more accurately translated as In Search for Lost Time). Rargh! I fear no Serious Literature!

I've been on a quest over the past few years to read works of literature that are so well-known that they've affected the culture I live in. Mainly that's led to my reading a lot of pop books that are merely OK (Valley of the Dolls, Mommie Dearest). I've also had to force my way through some real stinkers, like Flowers in the Attic and The Fountainhead. Seriously, if you are tempted to read Ayn Rand, I would suggest you read Starship Troopers first. They're both simple-minded political screeds masquerading as novels (so if you like the one you'll like the other), but Starship Troopers is several hundred pages shorter and somewhat less offensive. (I do not consider Heinlein's enthusiasm for, say, child abuse to be any less offensive than Rand's enthusiasm for rape. However, Heinlein spares the reader lovingly-detailed scenes of violent abuse, followed by the victim falling in love with her abuser, because being beaten and not experiencing any sensual pleasure was the best thing that ever happened to her. Honestly, I feel incredibly sorry for Rand.)

Anyway, after reading all these books that are famous but not very good, I decided to reward myself by reading Proust's massive novel, which is famous for being good. And difficult, although The New York Times makes the case that a good chunk of that difficulty is due to the fact that the first widely-available translation into English was simply not that great.

I'm enjoying it (in the new translation), but it is still a difficult book. It's not difficult the way the High Modernists (Pound, Eliot, Joyce) are difficult--Proust doesn't spend all his time making allusions to other works, and God help you if you haven't read them. The length is massive, and it's all one novel, so Proust will refer to a character you haven't seen for 900 pages (and, since he actually wasn't very good with details, the character's name or some other identifying feature has probably been changed), but that's not the main reason it's difficult. Mainly it's difficult because Proust was so damned smart. The book is largely about things like how we experience art and how we perceive reality, so it's like a million little philosophical and artistic essays crammed into one storyline. The essays are really good, and (unlike Rand and Heinlein) it's not just the same essay over and over, but it's taxing to read and process all those deep thoughts. Even when I'm not sick and dumb, Proust makes me wish I was more intelligent. Still, they are very insightful, and the rest of the book is funny and really well-written.

Buying behavior

This is a Washington Post article that starts out as a standard, "Self-Published Author Gets Rich!" story (they even use the phrase "gold rush" in the title, gah, despite a long disclaimer in the article that, no, sorry, most authors don't get rich by writing). Eventually, however, the article gets more interesting, because it attempts to analyze how e-book consumers behave, which is kind of an unknown at this point.

The article points out that romance readers tend also to be insatiable readers. As a result:

New marketing patterns of lower online prices and impulse buying created a perfect dynamic for authors like [romance author Nyree] Belleville: Genre authors who were prolific but who had not been too successful. This peculiar level of accomplishment meant they had written books for print publishers, seen sales vanish and had the rights revert back to them, and even had completed manuscripts that publishers had rejected.

This left with the writers with just the right recipe: a small but devout core audience; a readily available backlist for new readers to discover; a knack for writing fast; and an inherent appeal to a fan base that read voraciously.

 

Joe Konrath is a big believer in having a lot of titles out, and Bellevue's experience certainly supports his argument: Because of her speed and stash of completed books, she put out 12 books in 18 months. I will probably put out 12 books by the time I die. But you know, something? I'm OK with that.

Speak out with your geek out; or, in defense of science fiction

As I've mentioned, I'm totally sick, and I should probably hold off on attempting any writing until I have the energy to, you know, go outside and that sort of thing. But nay! I foolishly persevere! In particular, I'm going to do a Speak Out With Your Geek Out post about science fiction (I was alerted Speak Out by Sporkchop). I'm doing this because I am generally opposed to bullying, narrow-mindedness, and unethical "journalism."

When it comes to judging the quality of literature, narrow-mindedness is nothing new. My father was extremely defensive about his love for short stories, because when he was growing up, it was believed that short stories were for people who who were too dumb to read all the way through a novel. Eudora Welty is believed to have been robbed of the Nobel Prize for Literature because she wrote about the American South, and at that time it was thought that regional literature was for people who were too dumb to understand universal themes (you know--universal themes like what it's like to live in the Left Bank or Greenwich Village).

There's plenty of bad sci-fi out there, but there's plenty of bad everything out there. Refusing to read something because it's science fiction makes about as much sense as refusing to read short stories or regional writers--you're really, really just hurting yourself.

So, here's what I like about science fiction:

It's about the larger questions. Science fiction tends to be about either 1. society or 2. spirituality.

People often don't realize that. They think science fiction is either about 1. technology or 2. aliens. But at least the stuff I like isn't about technology or aliens in some kind of vacuum--it's about how these things affect humanity. If we had intelligent robots, how would people interact with them? If aliens landed, what would we do to them? How is technology used by governments to control people? If we had some kind of superhuman power, what would it do to us? Do we own our machines or do they own us? What is the purpose of humanity? How does the past affect the present and future? Is reality the here and now, or is it something somewhere else? What will become of us?

Even adventure sci-fi asks these kinds of questions, if it is good. You don't get this claustrophobic focus on the individual that seems to be the mark of Serious Literature these days. That individual focus can be done well, but it can also result in books that are entirely about the author's genitals and/or need for approval. Cracking open a sci-fi book after reading a book like that is like leaving a hermetically-sealed room and taking your first deep breath of fresh, clean air.

Unless you're reading Philip K. Dick, in which case it's like leaving a hermetically-sealed room and taking your first deep breath of hallucinogenic gas. But it's still pretty awesome.

On being slow to adjust

Oh, hi there! So, it's been over a week since the kids went home, and you might think that I've been hard at work! So very hard at work that I haven't even had time to post about it!

Ha-ha-ha! No, of course you haven't thought that, and I haven't been. Part of it is that I've been catching up on other things, part of it is that my time has been kind of broken up (which tends to prejudice me to working on short-term projects rather than this HUGE one), but mostly it's because it always takes me a while to get back into the writing/editing mind-set after a break. I'm slow to get started, once I start I'm slow, and then I get faster and faster until the project ends. It's weird.

I'm not the only one with dysfunctional adjustment patterns. Today's Wall Street Journal contains a fascinating little breakdown of why e-books from traditional publishers are so expensive.

Basically, traditional booksellers are accustomed to making a certain amount of money per book, and they're set up so that they need to hit that revenue target. From the article:

a hardcover book priced at $26 and sold under the traditional wholesale model will return $13 to a publisher. Subtract 15% for the author royalty, or $3.90, and that leaves a gross of $9.10, says publishing executives. Mr. Shatzkin says that it's appropriate to then deduct about $3.25 per copy for shipping, warehousing and production, leaving a gross per unit sold of $5.85, from which publishers must pay for returns and inventory.

 

In other words, the industry's expecting to make a little less than $5.85 per copy sold. And they can get that from an e-book! From the article:

a back-of-the-envelope calculation of a new e-book priced at $12.99 on Amazon or through Barnes & Noble Inc. under the 70%-30% agency pricing model suggests a return of $9.09 to the publisher in the form of sales. The publisher then typically has to pay the author 25% of net sales in the form of a royalty, or $2.27. This leaves a gross of $6.82. Subtract 90 cents for digital rights management, digital warehousing, production, and distribution, and that leaves $5.92.

 

So they can get a similar return! Whoo-hoo!

Oh, but there's a catch--the e-book has to cost $12.99. That's...kinda pricey for an e-book, no? At least, judging from the article, a lot of readers seem to think so.

Meanwhile, Amazon is trying to set up a free e-book lending service. They would make money because you'd have to join Amazon Prime to get it.

Hmmm..... On the one hand is a business that can't make money off a book that costs less than $13. On the other hand is a business that can make money off a book that is free. Which do you think is going to make it?

Whew!

OK, the remaining child has left, and I am officially DONE with this three-week marathon of child care. Honest to Pete, I don't know how full-time parents do it. Actually, I suppose I do--part of the problem is that I'm not really set up for child care, and it's not like I can ask a six- and/or three-year-old to kick back and watch Weeds with me. I have some toys for the younger kid, but apparently the most exciting thing I have in my house is my two cats, who are entertaining in the extreme, especially the mellow one who won't bite or scratch even if you grab his tail and pull it as hard as you can. (I yell and scream, but when did I ever matter?)

Anyway, I will be watching the younger one during the school year, but just one day out of the week (Tuesdays), so that will be less disruptive (and she's small enough that I can forcibly carry her out to the car so that we can go someplace "educational" and she can stop torturing the poor cats). Right now, I feel like EVERYTHING has been neglected--the yard needs work, I need to pay bills, and oh yeah, I was working on a book, wasn't I? So it may be a few days (like after Tuesday) before I can get it together enough to resume editing.